We do not use AI to write your CIPD work.
Your content is written by a real person, from scratch, based on your brief.
When we say No-AI, we mean we do not use any AI tool at any stage to create written content for your CIPD unit work.
That includes paraphrasing/spinner sites, auto-summarising tools, and browser add-ons that generate text.
You send your unit details, learning outcomes/criteria, deadline, word count, and any tutor guidance. We build the structure and write it properly.
We don’t “auto-reference”. If a source is used, it’s cited properly (Harvard) and added to the reference list by a human.
CIPD writing needs a steady tone across the whole document. AI often creates mixed tone and repeated phrasing. Human writing stays consistent.
No-AI isn’t just a claim. It’s a working rule.
Our internal rules:
What we protect:
What we don’t do:
Here’s what happens (clear steps):
If you want the output to be clean and consistent, send your brief, notes, and any reading list. Even bullet points help.
| Stage of work | AI used? | What happens instead |
|---|---|---|
| Outline / structure | ❌ | Human plan based on CIPD criteria |
| Writing the draft | ❌ | Human-written from scratch |
| Paraphrasing | ❌ | Manual paraphrasing with correct citation |
| Editing and improvements | ❌ | Human editing (no generators) |
| Harvard referencing | ❌ | Manual referencing from real sources |
| Revisions | ❌ | Human-only revisions based on feedback |
Common requests we can work with:
No. We don’t use AI generators at any stage, writing, rewriting, paraphrasing, or referencing.
No. Even outlines are made by a person, based on your CIPD criteria and brief.
No. We paraphrase manually and cite sources correctly.
Yes, but not by using AI. We’ll rewrite it properly, from scratch, using your notes and real sources.
Yes, if you want. Keep in mind different checkers can give different results, so we treat it as a supporting extra.
No. Your documents and details stay private and are not entered into public AI tools.
We write in plain English, keep one consistent voice, and edit manually. We also avoid repeated phrasing and generic filler.
Unit name, learning outcomes/criteria, word count, deadline, tutor notes (if any), and a little context (role/industry). Bullet points are fine.
Yes. Urgent still means human-written only. If timing is very tight, we’ll keep the structure focused to protect quality.
Yes. Revisions are also done without AI.